Breaking: MN House Committee Passes Safe Schools Bill

posted on Thu, Apr 2 2009 11:07 am by Family Equality Council

The Minnesota Legislature took one more important step toward enacting stronger bullying and harassment laws today. In the past few weeks, both the Senate and House committees responsible for education policy have taken testimony and, as of this morning, voted YES on the "Minnesota Safe Schools for All Bill," developed by Family Equality Council and OutFront Minnesota, in coalition with +35 diverse community groups. Now we move to the full Senate and House!

The work gets tougher from here on out, which is why we need your support to pass this important bill. Right now, 93% of Minnesota school districts do not protect against bullying and harassment based on sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, and association with people who are targeted because of their sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. The "Minnesota Safe Schools for All Bill" changes that, strengthening existing laws by making protections and remedies clearer for students, parents, administrators and staff. What could possibly be wrong with that?

Well, if you're asking the Minnesota Family Council, an anti-LGBT group opposing the bill, it's wrong to conduct research to find out whether existing protections work, and then, upon finding that they do not work, pass a law to improve them.

The Minnesota Family Council is rallying its supporters and talking to the media to spin this bill as best they can. Their tired arguments of "indoctrination" and "intimidation" don't stick anymore. Average Americans know that all students deserve to learn in safe environments, that all students do better in school when they're not worried about the next kick, punch, or swear.

In an attempt to scare people into opposing this bill, the Minnesota Family Council is sending emails to its membership claiming falsehoods to be true.

They even quote Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., saying "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." While I agree with the sentiment, I wonder what Dr. King, whose close advisor, Bayard Rustin, was an openly gay African-American man, would say about a group opposed to strengthening protections for young people "on the basis of, but not limited to, [their] actual or perceived race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, disability, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, age, and physical characteristics, and association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics."

Stay tuned for more opportunities to help support the "Minnesota Safe Schools for All Bill." Click here to download a fact sheet on the bill.
blog comments powered by Disqus